Repeated L5 Nerve Root Compromise Detected with Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP), but Not Electromyography (EMG): A Case Report.

We report a case where neuromonitoring, using motor evoked potentials (MEP), detected an intraoperative L5 nerve root deficit during a lumbosacral decompression and instrumented fusion procedure. Critically, the MEP changes were not preceded nor accompanied by any significant spontaneous electromyography (sEMG) activity. Presumptive L5 innervated muscles, including tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and gluteus maximus, were targets for nerve root surveillance using combined MEP and sEMG techniques. During a high-grade spondylolisthesis correction procedure, attempts to align a left-sided rod resulted in repeated loss and recovery cycles of MEP from the TA and EHL. No accompanying EMG alerts were associated with any of the MEP changes nor were MEP variations seen from muscles innervated above and below L5. After several attempts, the rod alignment was achieved, but significant MEP signal decrement (72% decrease) remained from the EHL. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant foot drop on the left side that recovered over a period of 3 months. This case contributes to a growing body of evidence that exclusive reliance on sEMG for spinal nerve root scrutiny can be unreliable and MEP may provide more dependable data on nerve root patency.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Corrective Surgery of Scoliosis - Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in reducing the postoperative neurologic deficit following corrective surgery of scoliosis. STUDY DESIGN: Observational Study. Place and Duration of the Study: Spine Surgery Department, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from December 2022 to May 2023. METHODOLOGY: The study included 170 cases of scoliosis operated under multimodal IONM. Decreased amplitude of ≥50% in SSEP or 70-80% in MEPs were considered warning signs. Cases were divided into two groups: Group 1 (signal drop) and Group 2 (no signal drop). Group 1 was subdivided into Group 1a (true positive), Group 1b (false positive) and Group 1c (intermediate positive). Group 2 was subdivided into Group 2a (true negative) and Group 2b (false negative). RESULTS: Evoked potential changes were observed in 27 (15.9%) cases. This includes transient drop of signals in 16 (9.4%) and sustained drop of signals in 11 (6.5%) cases. Among sustained signal drop, 9 (5.29%) cases had exhibited postoperative neurological deficit whereas 2 (1.17%) cases did not show postoperative neurological deficit (false positive). Multimodal IONM in the current study shows sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 98.6%, positive predictive value of 92.6%, and negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: Multimodal IONM reduces the incidence of postoperative neurological deficit in corrective surgery of scoliosis by effectively detecting neurologic injury during surgery. Monitoring events alert surgical team to exercise immediate corrective measures which likely results in recovery of lost signals and predict the favorable outcome. KEY WORDS: Intraoperative monitoring, Motor evoked potentials, Neurological deficit, Scoliosis, Somatosensory evoked potentials.

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring and Mapping in Children Undergoing Brainstem Surgery.

SUMMARY: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during surgery for brainstem lesions is a challenge for intraoperative neurophysiologists and surgeons. The brainstem is a small structure packed with vital neuroanatomic networks of long and short pathways passing through the brainstem or originating from it. Many central pattern generators exist within the brainstem for breathing, swallowing, chewing, cardiovascular regulation, and eye movement. During surgery around the brainstem, these generators need to be preserved to maintain their function postoperatively. This short review presents neurophysiologic and neurosurgical experiences of brainstem surgery in children.

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring and Mapping During Surgery on Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors in Children and Adolescents.

SUMMARY: Surgical resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors carries significant risks of neurologic deficits, especially in cases of infiltrative tumors. In pediatric patients, this type of surgery may be associated with a high risk of poor neurologic outcome. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring has been adopted as part of the clinical routine by many centers as a useful adjunct for intraoperative assessment of neurologic integrity. To what extent intraoperative neurophysiologic mapping strategies may further support intraoperative decision-making is still a matter of debate. Here, we report on a small cohort of five pediatric patients in whom mapping with the double-train paradigm was used to identify the dorsal column and corticospinal tract and to guide the surgical resection. We also discuss the possible benefits and challenges regarding the available literature.

Intraoperative Monitoring of Scoliosis Surgery in Young Patients.

SUMMARY: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring has added substantially to the safety of spinal deformity surgery correction since its introduction over four decades ago. Monitoring routinely includes both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials. Either modality alone will detect almost all instances of spinal cord injury during deformity correction. The combined use of the two modalities provides complementary information, can permit more rapidly identification of problems, and enhances safety though parallel redundancy should one modality fail. Both techniques are well established and continue to be refined. Although there is room for provider preference, proper monitoring requires attention to technical detail, understanding of the underlying physiology, and familiarity with effects of commonly used anesthetic agents.

Dorsal Rhizotomy in the Pediatric Patient.

SUMMARY: The majority of cases of dorsal rhizotomy surgeries in children are done to improve the spasticity associated with cerebral palsy, and more recent techniques are selective in nature and referred to as selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR). The techniques applied to selective dorsal rhizotomy surgery has changed since it was first described and continues to undergo modifications. Approaches to surgery and monitoring vary slightly among centers. This article provides a review of the rationale, variety of surgical approaches, and intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring methods used along with discussion of the risks, complications and outcomes in these surgeries.

Removal of schwannoma from the psoas muscle with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: A case report.

RATIONALE: The incidence of a schwannoma within the psoas muscle is rare, and only a few cases have been reported. The surgical approach to removing schwannomas present in the psoas muscle is challenging because of its anatomical proximity to the lumbar plexus. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 31-year-old man experienced right lower back pain and anterolateral thigh numbness for 2 months. DIAGNOSIS: Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient's lumbar spine revealed a mass lesion, which was radiologically diagnosed as a well-demarcated schwannoma. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent surgery for excision of the schwannoma in the right psoas muscle at the second to fourth lumbar vertebrae levels. During surgery, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring modalities, free-running and triggered electromyography and evoked potentials, from the target muscles were recorded. OUTCOMES: There was no neurotonic discharge corresponding to neuronal injury. Compound motor nerve action potential was detected in the triggered electromyography of muscles around the medial margin of the tumor. However, direct integration of the motor nerve was not observed in the intra-tumor region. LESSONS: We report that schwannoma removal in the psoas muscle, which is adjacent to the lumbar plexus, can be safely performed using intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Application of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) for Preventing Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical value of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) for dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery with and without IONM. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled study was conducted on 46 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. Twenty-three patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery did not undergo IONM (non-IONM group), while the other 23 patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery did ("IONM group"). The swallowing function of patients was evaluated using the EAT-10 and endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) after surgery. RESULTS: There was no difference in the incidence of swallowing difficulties between the intervention group and the control group on the third day or sixth week after surgery. At the 12th week after surgery, the incidence of swallowing difficulties in the intervention group and the control group was significantly different (43.5% vs. 13.0%, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: IONM is a promising tool for identifying and protecting the spinal cord and nerves during anterior cervical surgery. Our research revealed that IONM significantly reduced the occurrence of swallowing disorders 12 weeks after surgery, but the effect was not significant at the third or sixth week after surgery.

Prospective Validation of the Spinal Cord Shape Classification System in the Prediction of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Data Loss: Assessing the Risk of Spinal Cord Data Loss During Spinal Deformity Correction.

BACKGROUND: The Spinal Cord Shape Classification System (SCSCS) class has been associated with spinal cord monitoring data loss during spinal deformity surgery. The objective of the current study was to prospectively validate the SCSCS as a predictor of spinal cord monitoring data loss during spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of consecutive patients who were undergoing primary deformity surgery at a single institution from 2018 to 2023 and whose major curve was in the spinal cord region was undertaken. Spinal cord morphology at the apex of the major curve on preoperative axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was used to categorize patients into 3 spinal cord shape types based on the SCSCS. The primary outcome was intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data loss related to spinal cord dysfunction. Demographics and surgical and radiographic variables were compared between patients with IONM data loss and those without loss. Predictors of IONM loss were determined using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients (168 adult, 88 pediatric) were included and were separated into 3 SCSCS types: 110 (43.0%) with Type I, 105 (41.0%) with Type II, and 41 (16.0%) with Type III. IONM loss was observed in 30 (11.7%) of the 256 patients, including 7 (6.4%) of 110 with SCSCS Type I, 7 (6.7%) of 105 with Type II, and 16 (39.0%) of 41 with Type III. IONM loss was associated with SCSCS Type III, the preoperative deformity angular ratio, performance of 3-column osteotomies, greater operative time, greater transfusion volume, and greater postoperative sagittal corrections. SCSCS type was the strongest independent predictor of IONM data loss. SCSCS Type III had the greatest odds of IONM loss (odds ratio [OR] = 6.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.45 to 18.23 compared with Types I and II combined). The overall predictive performance with respect to IONM loss (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.827) was considered excellent. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective cohort study of patients undergoing spinal deformity correction confirmed that patients with a Type-III spinal cord shape had greater odds of IONM loss. Inclusion of the SCSCS in preoperative risk stratification and intraoperative management of spinal deformity corrective surgery is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Diagnostic utility of different types of somatosensory evoked potential changes in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring and types of SSEP changes in predicting the risk of postoperative neurological outcomes during correction surgery for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) in the pediatric age group (≤ 21 years). METHODS: Database review was performed to identify literature on pediatric patients with IS who underwent correction with intraoperative neuromonitoring. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of transient and persistent SSEP changes and complete SSEP loss in predicting postoperative neurological deficits were calculated. RESULTS: Final analysis included 3778 patients. SSEP changes had a sensitivity of 72.9%, specificity of 96.8%, and DOR of 102.3, while SSEP loss had a sensitivity of 41.8%, specificity of 99.3%, and DOR of 133.2 for predicting new neurologic deficits. Transient and persistent SSEP changes had specificities of 96.8% and 99.1%, and DORs of 16.6 and 59, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative SSEP monitoring can predict perioperative neurological injury and improve surgical outcomes in pediatric scoliosis fusion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Lead Placement for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Literature Review and Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a viable interventional option for intractable pain management. Although systematic data are lacking regarding the immediate neurologic complications of this procedure, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) can be a valuable tool to detect real-time neurologic changes and prompt intervention(s) during DRG-S performed under general anesthesia and deep sedation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our single-center case series, we performed multimodal IONM, including peripheral nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (pnSSEPs) and dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (dSSEPs), spontaneous electromyography (EMG), transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and electroencephalogram (EEG) for some trials and all permanent DRG-S lead placement per surgeon preference. Alert criteria for each IONM modality were established before data acquisition and collection. An IONM alert was used to implement an immediate repositioning of the lead to reduce any possible postoperative neurologic deficits. We reviewed the literature and summarized the current IONM modalities commonly applied during DRG-S, including somatosensory evoked potentials and EMG. Because DRG-S targets the dorsal roots, we hypothesized that including dSSEP would allow more sensitivity as a proxy for potential sensory changes under generalized anesthesia than would including standard pnSSEPs. RESULTS: From our case series of 22 consecutive procedures with 45 lead placements, one case had an alert immediately after DRG-S lead positioning. In this case, dSSEP attenuation was seen, indicating changes in the S1 dermatome, which occurred despite ipsilateral pnSSEP from the posterior tibial nerve remaining at baselines. The dSSEP alert prompted the surgeon to reposition the S1 lead, resulting in immediate recovery of the dSSEP to baseline status. The rate of IONM alerts reported intraoperatively was 4.55% per procedure and 2.22% per lead (n = 1). No neurologic deficits were reported after the procedure, resulting in no postoperative neurologic complications or deficits. No other IONM changes or alerts were observed from pnSSEP, spontaneous EMG, MEPs, or EEG modalities. Reviewing the literature, we noted challenges and potential deficiencies when using current IONM modalities for DRG-S procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series suggests dSSEPs offer greater reliability than do pnSSEPs in quickly detecting neurologic changes, and subsequent neural injury, during DRG-S cases. We encourage future studies to focus on adding dSSEP to standard pnSSEP to provide a comprehensive, real-time neurophysiological assessment during lead placement for DRG-S. More investigation, collaboration, and evidence are required to evaluate, compare, and standardize comprehensive IONM protocols for DRG-S.

Impact of Preoperative Mapping and Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery for Deep-Seated Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery changes the surgical strategy for deep-seated lesions by promoting a deficit-sparing approach. When integrated with preoperative brain mapping and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), this approach may potentially improve patient outcomes. In this study, we assessed the impact of preoperative brain mapping and IONM in tubular retractor-assisted neuro-oncological surgery. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery for resection of deep-seated brain tumors from 2016 to 2022. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: group 1, no preoperative mapping or IONM (17 patients); group 2, IONM only (25 patients); group 3, both preoperative mapping and IONM (38 patients). RESULTS: We analyzed 80 patients (33 males and 47 females) with a median age of 46.5 years (range: 1-81 years). There was no significant difference in mean tumor volume (26.2 cm3 [range 1.07-97.4 cm3]; P = 0.740) and mean preoperative depth of the tumor (31 mm [range 3-65 mm], P = 0.449) between the groups. A higher proportion of high-grade gliomas and metastases was present within group 3 (P = 0.003). IONM was related to fewer motor (P = 0.041) and language (P = 0.032) deficits at hospital discharge. Preoperative mapping and IONM were also related to shorter length of stay (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative and intraoperative brain mapping and monitoring enhance transsulcal tubular retractor-assisted minimally invasive parafascicular surgery in neuro-oncology. Patients had a reduced length of stay and prolonged overall survival. IONM alone reduces postoperative neurological deficit.

Effectiveness of MEP and SSEP Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Neurological Dysfunction Immediately After Craniotomy Aneurysm Clipping.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnostic accuracy of motor-evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring in predicting immediate neurological dysfunction after craniotomy aneurysm clipping. METHODS: A total of 184 patients with neurosurgery aneurysms in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from April 2019 to December 2021 were retrospectively included. All patients underwent craniotomy aneurysm clipping, and MEP and SSEP were used to monitor during the operation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for early warning of MEP and SSEP amplitude decline and to evaluate the effectiveness of MEP and SSEP changes in predicting immediate postoperative neurological dysfunction. RESULTS: Among the 184 patients with intracranial aneurysms, the incidences of immediate postoperative neurological dysfunction were 44.4% (12/27) and 3.2% (5/157) in patients with intraoperative MEP changes and without changes, respectively. For SSEP, The incidence rates were 52.6% (10/19) and 4.2% (7/165), respectively, and the differences were statistically significant ( P <0.001). Significant changes in intraoperative MEP and SSEP were significantly associated with the development of immediate postoperative neurological deficits ( P <0.05). The critical values for early warning of MEP and SSEP amplitude decrease were: 61.6% ( P < 0.001, area under the curve 0.803) for MEP amplitude decrease and 54.6% ( P <0.001, area under the curve 0.770) for SSEP amplitude decrease. The sensitivity and specificity of MEP amplitude change in predicting immediate postoperative neurological dysfunction were 70.6% and 91.0%, respectively. For SSEP amplitude changes, the sensitivity and specificity were 58.8% and 95.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Motor-evoked potential and SSEP monitoring have moderate sensitivity and high specificity for immediate postoperative neurological dysfunction after craniotomy aneurysm clipping. Motor-evoked potential is more accurate than SSEP. Patients with changes in MEP and SSEP are at greatly increased risk of immediate postoperative neurologic deficits.

Variability of somatosensory evoked potential and motor evoked potential change criteria in thoracic spinal decompression surgery based on preoperative motor status.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Combined somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential (SSEP and MEP) changes for predicting prognosis in thoracic spinal surgery have been variably reported. PURPOSE: We aimed to explore the validity of combined SSEP and MEP for predicting postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) in thoracic spinal decompression surgery (TSDS) and identify a relatively optimal neurophysiological predictor of PMDs in patients based on preoperative motor status. STUDY SETTING: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 475 patients were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURES: A reduction in muscle strength by more than or equal to one manual muscle testing (MMT) grade postoperatively compared with the preoperative MMT grade was identified as PMDs. Postoperative motor deficits were detected by comparing the preoperative and postoperative physical examination findings in short- and long-term follow-up visits. METHODS: All patients were divided into two subgroups according to preoperative motor status. The following data were collected: (1) demographic data; (2) IONM (intraoperative neuromonitoring) data; and (3) postoperative motor outcomes. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of IONM change to predict PMDs. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to establish optimal IONM warning criteria. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients had severe preoperative motor deficits (Group S), and 377 patients did not (Group N). MEP and SSEP change was effective for predicting PMDs in the short term (p<.01) and long term (p<.01) for TSDS patients. In Group N, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were a decrease of 65% in SSEP amplitude and 89.5% in MEP amplitude of the baseline value. Furthermore, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were durations of change of 24.5 minutes for SSEP and 32.5 minutes for MEP. In Group S, however, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were a decrease of 36.5% in SSEP amplitude and 59.5% in MEP amplitude of the baseline value. Moreover, the critical values for predicting short-term PMDs were durations of change of 16.5 minutes for SSEP and 17.5 minutes for MEP. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal IONM changes for prediction vary depending on preoperative motor status. Combined SSEP and MEP are excellent for predicting PMDs in TSDS.

The effects of dexmedetomidine on intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring modalities during corrective scoliosis surgery in pediatric patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: During scoliosis surgery, motor evoked potentials (MEP), and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) have been reported to be affected by the use of higher doses of anesthetic agents. Dexmedetomidine, a sympatholytic agent, an alpha-2 receptor agonist, has been used as an adjunctive agent to lower anesthetic dose. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of dexmedetomidine on the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of MEP and SSEP during surgery, particularly among pediatric patients. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to determine whether, during spinal fusion surgery in pediatric patients with scoliosis, dexmedetomidine alters MEP amplitude or SSEP latency and amplitude and, if so, whether different doses of dexmedetomidine display different effects (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022300562). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library on January 1, 2022 and included randomized controlled trials, observational cohort and case-control studies and case series investigating dexmedetomidine in the population of interest and comparing against a standardized anesthesia regimen without dexmedetomidine or comparing multiple doses of dexmedetomidine. Animal and in vitro studies and conference abstracts were excluded. RESULTS: We found substantial heterogeneity in the risk of bias (per Cochrane-preferred tools) of the included articles (n = 5); results are summarized without meta-analysis. Articles with the lowest risk of bias indicated that dexmedetomidine was associated with MEP loss and that higher doses of dexmedetomidine increased risk. In contrast, articles reporting no association between dexmedetomidine and MEP loss suffered from higher risk of bias, including suspected or confirmed problems with confounding, outcome measurement, participant selection, results reporting, and lack of statistical transparency and power. CONCLUSION: Given the limitations of the studies available in the literature, it would be advisable to conduct rigorous randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine use of in scoliosis surgery in pediatric patients.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and spinal cord stimulator implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most dreaded complications after spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implantation surgery. As a result, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been proposed to avoid accidental damage to nervous structures under anesthesia and confirm positioning for optimal stimulation. Our study uses a large administrative claims database to determine the 30-day risk of SCI after SCS implantation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases from 2016 to 2019. Adult patients undergoing SCS surgical procedures with at least 90 days of follow-up, IONM use, the type of sedation used during the procedure, and subsequent SCI were identified using administrative codes. In addition, logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between various risk factors and subsequent SCI. RESULTS: A total of 9676 patients underwent SCS surgery (64.7% percutaneous implants) during the study period. Nine hundred and forty-four (9.75%) patients underwent SCS implantation with IONM. Conscious sedation, Monitored Anesthesia Care anesthesia, and general anesthesia were used in patients with 0.9%, 60.2%, and 28.6%, respectively. Eighty-one (0.8%) patients developed SCI within 30 days after SCS implant surgery. The SCI rate was higher in the group that underwent IONM (2% vs 0.7%, p value <0.001) during the implantation procedure, reflecting the underlying risk. After adjustment for other factors, the OR of SCI is 2.39 (95% CI: 1.33 to 4.14, p value=0.002) times higher for those with IONM than those without IONM. CONCLUSIONS: Increased SCI risk among patients with IONM likely reflects higher baseline risk, and further research is needed for risk mitigation.

Changes in motor evoked potentials after erector spinae block in scoliosis surgery-when to take pre-incision baseline recordings?

Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is highly valuable in scoliosis surgeries for monitoring spinal cord function, particularly during instrumentation. Accurate timing of baseline recordings of TcMEP and SSEP is crucial, as any changes observed during surgery and instrumentation are compared to these baseline recordings. However, the impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block (USG-ESPB) on SSEP and TcMEP is not well-studied in scoliosis surgery. In this report, we present two cases of scoliosis surgery where bilateral two-level USG-ESPB using different concentrations of ropivacaine (0.375% and 0.2%) resulted in a transient and significant deterioration of TcMEP, occurring 3 minutes after the block and lasting for 20 minutes. Remarkably, SSEPs remained unchanged during this period. These findings suggest that USG-ESPB may produce TcMEP changes, highlighting the importance of carefully considering the timing of baseline TcMEP acquisition in scoliosis surgery.

Persistent hemiplegia with normal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in supratentorial neurosurgery: a case report and review of literature.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is needed for evaluating and demonstrating the integrity of the central and peripheral nervous system during surgical manoeuvres that take place in proximity to eloquent motor and somatosensory nervous structures. The integrity of the monitored motor pathways is not always followed by consistent clinical normality, particularly in the first hours/days following surgery, when surgical resection involves brain structures such as the supplementary motor areas (SMA). We report the case of a patient who underwent surgical excision of a right frontal glioblastoma with normal preoperative, intraoperative (IONM), and postoperative central motor conduction, but with persistent postoperative hemiplegia (> 6 months). The literature regarding SMA syndrome and its diagnosis and prognosis is reviewed.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Spines at Risk During Nonspine Surgery: A 9-Year Review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with certain spinal anomalies are at risk for rare but devastating spinal cord injuries under anesthesia. We created a Spine at Risk (SAR) program to evaluate and recommend precautions for such patients, including intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) use for the highest-risk patients. We aimed to review all monitored nonspine procedures to determine rate of potential spinal cord injuries avoided in those who would otherwise have been unmonitored. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional SAR program from 2011 to 2019 to analyze the number of nonspine anesthetized procedures that were done under IONM, the characteristics of those that had an IONM alert; and the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 3,453 patients flagged for SAR review, 1121 (33%) received a precaution recommendation, and 359 (10% of all flagged) were given IONM recommendations. Of those, 57 patients (16% of recommendations, 2% of all flagged) had a total of 102 nonspine anesthetized procedures done under IONM. Seven patients had a total of 10 cases with IONM alerts. Two cases were aborted when improved signals could not be obtained after working through a checklist; one of these patients woke with transient neurological deficits. Signals improved to baseline in 7 cases by working through a signal loss checklist. One case was aborted preoperatively when monitorable baseline signals could not be obtained. CONCLUSIONS: In the highest-risk spinal anomaly patients, we monitored an average of 11.7 nonspine cases per year, with a 10% rate of IONM alerts, and no permanent neurological deficits. Although the majority of patients remain safe during procedures, in the most critical patients IONM allowed the team to identify and react to alerts that may have otherwise led to permanent neurological injury. This is the largest series of spinal cord-monitored nonspine pediatric cases. It is important for pediatric orthopedic surgeons to evaluate at-risk patients and recommend IONM where appropriate, to protect both patients and our procedural colleagues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level IV.